Basic Science for Clinicians

The Relationship between APOL1 Structure and Function: Clinical Implications

Sethu M. Madhavan and Matthias Buck
Kidney360 January 2021, 2 (1) 134-140; DOI: https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0002482020

Abstract

Common variants in the APOL1 gene are associated with an increased risk of nondiabetic kidney disease in individuals of African ancestry. Mechanisms by which APOL1 variants mediate kidney disease pathogenesis are not well understood. Amino acid changes resulting from the kidney disease–associated APOL1 variants alter the three-dimensional structure and conformational dynamics of the C-terminal α-helical domain of the protein, which can rationalize the functional consequences. Understanding the three-dimensional structure of the protein, with and without the risk variants, can provide insights into the pathogenesis of kidney diseases mediated by APOL1 variants.

Introduction

Population-based studies have established a strong association of two variants in the APOL1 gene with the excess risk of nondiabetic CKD in individuals of African ancestry (1⇓⇓⇓–5). One variant involves the substitution of two amino acids (S342G and I384M; termed G1), and the other involves the deletion of two consecutive amino acids (N388 and Y389; termed G2) compared with the ancestral nonrisk allele termed G0. APOL1 G1 and G2 variants are common in individuals with African ancestry, with at least 50% of individuals carrying one copy of the risk allele and 15% with two copies of the risk allele (1,3). Despite the strong association of APOL1 variants with kidney disease, the molecular mechanisms by which these APOL1 variants contribute to CKD pathogenesis and progression remain unclear. In this review, we discuss the studies that characterized the structural properties of APOL1 and the effect of APOL1-G1 and -G2 variants on the structure.

Biology of APOL1

APOL1 is a member of the six-member APOL gene cluster located in human chromosome 22 (6⇓–8). APOL1 has unique features compared with other APOL family proteins. APOL1 was initially identified in the human pancreas but is widely expressed, with the most abundant expression in the placenta, lungs, prostate, and spleen (9). Unlike the other members of the APOL family, the APOL1 gene is limited to humans and a few nonhuman primates (7,8). Also, although APOL1 is predominantly synthesized in the liver, it is secreted and circulates in the blood in complex with HDL particles (9,10). The circulating APOL1-G0 is known to function as an innate immune factor by conferring protection from Trypanosoma brucei brucei, a parasite that causes endemic African sleeping sickness (11,12). However, additional species of trypanosomes evolved with a truncated variant surface glycoprotein, called the serum resistance–associated (SRA) protein, that neutralizes the trypanolytic effect of APOL1-G0 (12,13). In the healthy human kidney, APOL1 is synthesized and expressed in podocytes and glomerular and extraglomerular vascular endothelial cells (14⇓⇓–17). APOL1 expression in cultured human podocyte and endothelial cell lines is low, but the expression is upregulated by immune stimuli, such as cytokines (15,18). The intracellular function of APOL1 remains to be fully understood, but multiple functions—including a role in the regulation of autophagy, intracellular vesicle trafficking, ion-channel activity, and providing a protective effect from HIV infection—have been proposed (14,19⇓⇓⇓–23).

APOL1 Variants and Risk of Kidney Disease

The risk of kidney disease associated with APOL1 variants vary on the basis of the CKD phenotype, and best fits a recessive model (1⇓–3). A single allele of APOL1 G1 or G2 exhibits trypanolytic activity against additional subspecies of trypanosomes, like T. brucei rhodesiense, providing a survival advantage (1). At the protein level, APOL1-G1 and -G2 variants failed to bind the trypanosomal SRA protein, partially explaining the extended trypanolytic activity and why the variants are positively selected in areas where trypanosomiasis is endemic (1,24). However, when two copies of these variants are present (homozygous alleles), there is a greater predisposition to kidney-disease risk in addition to the extended trypanolytic activity. This scenario is reminiscent of hemoglobin S (HbS) and sickle cell disease, where a single allele of HbS results in sickle cell trait that is partially protective against malaria, whereas two alleles of HbS results in clinically evident sickle cell disease (25,26). Circulating levels of APOL1 did not associate with CKD risk (27,28). Hence, it is hypothesized that the dysregulated cellular homeostasis is caused by variant APOL1, which is synthesized and expressed in the podocyte itself. The risk effect depends on the kidney disease phenotype with highest risk in developing HIV-associated nephropathy (odds ratio: 29, 95% CI: 13 to 68), followed by FSGS (odds ratio: 17, 95% CI: 11 to 26), and hypertension-associated kidney disease (odds ratio: 7, 95% CI: 5.6 to 9.5) (1⇓–3). Other CKD phenotypes, including SLE-related collapsing glomerulopathy and sickle cell disease–related nephropathy, have also been associated with the presence of high-risk APOL1 genotypes (29,30). With about 15% of Americans of African descent carrying two copies of high-risk APOL1 variants, about 5 million individuals are at risk of developing CKD. However, clinically evident CKD develops in a lower proportion, suggesting that—in addition to the background of homozygous APOL1 high-risk variants—a “second hit” is required to manifest CKD.

Mechanisms of APOL1-Mediated Kidney Disease

Over the past decade, multiple studies have advanced our understanding of APOL1 variant–mediated kidney disease. These studies have established a variable subcellular localization of APOL1 proteins and demonstrated an activation of spatially diverse cell signaling cascades that disrupt cellular homeostasis. Cytotoxicity—which results from an enhanced cation channel activity, impaired intracellular vesicular trafficking, induction of stress-activated protein kinase pathways, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and reduced mitochondrial respiration rates—has been proposed as a mechanism for APOL1-G1– and -G2–induced CKD pathogenesis (14,20,21,31⇓⇓⇓⇓–36). A unified mechanism that explains the dysregulated effect of APOL1-G1 and -G2, which leads to CKD pathogenesis and progression, is still lacking.

Structure-Function Correlation of APOL1 Variants: Why Is It Important?

Understanding the three-dimensional structure of proteins, and the effects of genetic variations on their structure, can provide valuable clues to unravel the disease pathogenesis and identify potential therapeutic strategies. Even a single amino-acid change caused by gene variations can change the structure of a protein, resulting in devastating functional consequences. This is well illustrated in the structural studies aimed at understanding the biology of hemoglobin and the functional effect of the HbS variation on the structure of hemoglobin. The structure of hemoglobin revealed the allosteric properties of the protein with respect to oxygen binding, resulting in the formation of oxyhemoglobin (37,38). Structural studies on HbS revealed that a single amino-acid variation from glutamate to valine in the β-chain of hemoglobin results in polymerization of deoxy-HbS, which, in turn, is the cause for the sickling of red blood cells (39). These structure-based studies have successfully guided the development of therapeutic strategies aimed at reversing the abnormal hemoglobin polymerization to treat sickle cell disease (40⇓–42). As another example, a comprehensive characterization of the structure of aquaporin advanced the understanding of the function and development of molecules that can modulate its function in kidney tubules (43).

The structure of APOL1 has not been experimentally resolved so far. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, x-ray crystallography, and cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) are the major, established methods to determine the three-dimensional structure of proteins experimentally. The advantages of each of these methods vary with the intrinsic properties of the protein being studied. For example, although the structure and dynamics of proteins can be studied in solution using NMR spectroscopy, it is not a method that is suited to study large-sized protein structures. X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM, on the other hand, are well suited to study large biomolecular complexes, but provide no information about weaker binding interactions or protein dynamics. Our current understanding of the structure of APOL1-G0 and the effect of G1 and G2 variants on the protein structure and dynamics have been obtained from computational modeling, molecular-dynamics (MD) simulations, and biophysical studies on recombinant APOL1. Computational modeling uses three main methods to predict a protein’s structure. The first and most effective is comparative or homology modeling, where the three-dimensional structure of an evolutionarily related protein is used as a template to generate a structural model for the protein of interest (44,45). The second modeling method relies on the observation that proteins from different evolutionary backgrounds can have similar structures. Hence, in the absence of a closely related template protein, structure prediction can be achieved by modeling (“threading”) the target protein sequence into many possible known protein structures—the structures that are most compatible with the threaded protein sequences are considered further (46). The third, and least accurate, method is ab initio modeling, where the protein structure is predicted on the basis of physical properties (energy estimates derived from protein sequence used to predict secondary structures, turns, etc.) without using a template and, hence, this latter method is computationally exhaustive (47,48). The structural model that is predicted from these methods may not accurately reflect the physiologic conformation of the protein, which can vary on the basis of specific cellular location and function. To advance the understanding of a protein structure, MD simulations can be applied to further refine the protein-structure models obtained from these methods. MD simulation is a computational method to study the time-dependent conformational behavior of biomolecules using the physics of atom movements at a certain temperature (14,49⇓–51). APOL1 protein is divided into four domains, and the nomenclature was established in the context of its known function as the trypanosomal killing factor (11⇓–13,52,53). The domains include a signal peptide region (M1-R26), a pore-forming domain (M60-W235), a membrane addressing domain (A238-P304), and a C-terminal trypanosomal SRA protein–interacting domain (A339-L398). APOL1 G1 and G2 variants are located in the C-terminal SRA-interacting domain, and most studies have focused on establishing the structure of this region (Figure 1). Because the structure of any proteins similar to APOL1 has not been experimentally resolved so far, the structural models proposed have used threading and ab initio modeling methods in conjunction with MD simulations (12,14,54).

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

APOL1 protein domain organization and location of kidney disease-associated variants. (A) Schematic representation of APOL1 protein domains. The location of G1 and G2 variants are represented in the C-terminal SRA-interacting domain in magenta (G1) and yellow (G2) bars. (B) The amino acid sequence of the C-terminal SRA-interacting domain showing the locations of G1 and G2 amino-acid changes compared with reference protein G0. SRA, serum resistance–associated protein.

An initial model of the APOL1 C-terminus was published well before its association with kidney disease was discovered. The C-terminal SRA-interacting domain of APOL1-G0 (P340-L398) was shown to form an amphipathic α-helix that interacted with the SRA protein in the endosomal compartment of trypanosomes (12). The structural model for this interaction provided insights into the neutralization of APOL1 activity by subspecies of Trypanosoma that cause human disease. The structural model suggested mutations that were then engineered to validate the putative binding interface in the SRA protein. Similarly, naturally occurring kidney disease–associated APOL1-G1 and -G2 variants result in an unstable complex formation and, hence, extended trypanolytic activity of variant APOL1 (1,12,24). Sharma et al. (54) advanced the structural studies to an extended portion (P340-L398) of the C-terminus of APOL1-G0, -G1, and -G2 using computational modeling. Their studies showed the APOL1 C-terminus formed an α-helical hairpin structure. In this model, the amino-acid substitution and deletion, corresponding to the G1 and G2 variants, resulted in the loss of interhelical hydrogen bonds, which then manifested as a higher conformational mobility of the α-helical hairpin (Figure 2). Consistent with these observations, the two-dimensional NMR spectra of G1 varied considerably from those of G0. Our studies modeled a larger fragment of the APOL1 C-terminus (R305-L398) using threading algorithms followed by all-atom MD simulations (14). Similar to the other models, the C-terminus of APOL1 formed an α-helical bundle with amino acid changes induced by G1 and G2 variants, resulting in a reduced conformational flexibility of the variant protein. Although the initial model of reference and variant APOL1 C-termini proposed by the two latter studies are similar, MD simulations showed a different time-dependent conformational behavior. There are multiple explanations for these apparent differences, including the longer protein fragment (residues 305–398)—which added an additional α-helix—and a more current force field (computational method to estimate energy between atoms) used in our studies (14). Recently, Jha et al. (55) modeled the full-length structure of APOL1 proteins using ab initio methods followed by MD simulations. In addition to confirming the C-terminal helical conformation adopted by APOL1s, the model showed the role of variant residues (S342 and I384 in G1 and Y389 in G2) in establishing the channel function of APOL1. Overall, the protein conformational changes induced by the G1 and G2 variants could disrupt the protein-protein interaction that is necessary for the cellular homeostatic function of APOL1 predisposing to CKD pathogenesis.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Protein structure of APOL1 C-terminus (T336-L398) obtained by computational modeling and molecular dynamics simulation. (A) Overlap of G0 (green) and G1 (blue), (B) G0 (blue) and G2 (orange), and (C) G1 (blue) and G2 (orange) structures, showing areas of structural differences highlighted in circled regions. Reprinted from ref. 54, with permission.

APOL1 is a membrane-associated protein with several putative transmembrane domains (21,56⇓–58) that localizes to multiple cellular membrane environments, including endolysosomes, Golgi–endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, and plasma membranes (14,20,23,31,32,34⇓–36,55,58⇓⇓–61). In this membrane environment, full-length APOL1 proteins, especially the G1 and G2 variants, formed large mol wt oligomers, as determined by native, nonreducing PAGE. Such oligomers may mediate the cellular cascades, leading to cytotoxicity (36). Recent studies characterizing the channel function of APOL1 have suggested that the C-terminal α-helix of APOL1 (D337-E355) mediates pH gating and membrane insertion (57,58). This group has proposed a model where membrane insertion of APOL1 exposes the C-terminus of the protein to the organelle lumen, when APOL1 is localized to endo-/lysosomes (in the secretory pathway), and to the extracellular side, when the protein is localized to the plasma membrane. Although plausible, such a membrane topology will not enable protein-protein interactions of the APOL1 C-terminus with effector proteins and protein domains that are localized to the cytoplasm (14). Current evidence suggests that kidney-expressed APOL1-G1 and -G2 are the key mediators of kidney disease pathogenesis (27,28). Additionally, APOL1 localizes to subcellular compartments other than endolysosomes and the plasma membrane (34,36,60,62). The orientation of proteins on membranes are dynamic and can vary in different organelles due to changes in lipid composition of organelle membranes (63,64). Hence, it is tempting to hypothesize that APOL1 inserts to membranes and the APOL1 C-terminus is exposed to the cytoplasm, where it can participate in coiled-coil interactions with facilitator proteins. Further studies focused on characterizing APOL1 structure will be critical to understand the topology of APOL1 domains after membrane insertion. To discover the interacting protein partners of APOL1, we searched for proteins with structural similarity to trypanosomal SRA protein, which is the known protein interactor of the APOL1 C-terminus. This led to the identification of the SNARE family of proteins as potential interaction partners of APOL1. SNARE-family proteins are integral membrane proteins that constitute the molecular machinery mediating membrane fusion between cellular compartments and predominantly localize to the endolysosomal compartment. SNARE-mediated membrane fusion and intracellular trafficking contribute to biologic functions, such as autophagy, neurotransmitter release, and viral endocytosis (65,66). Our and other studies showed that APOL1-G0 interacted with the SNARE protein, vesicle-associated membrane protein 8 (VAMP8), whereas the presence of G1 and G2 variants attenuated this interaction (14,20). VAMP8 is known to be a predominantly endosome-lysosome–localized SNARE protein that is involved in cellular functions, including regulation of vesicle trafficking by mediating the maturation of endosomes and autophagosomes. The membrane fusion events of VAMP8 and other SNARE proteins are mediated through the coiled-coil interaction with cognate protein partners via the SNARE domain. This domain has an α-helical structure, much like the domain at the C-terminus of APOL1. Taken together, these studies suggest that kidney disease–associated, variant-mediated, protein conformational changes could hamper the ability of variant APOL1 to activate podocyte stress-response protein networks, leading to CKD development and progression. Whether kidney-disease pathogenesis caused by APOL1-G1 and -G2 is secondary to loss of function in the presence of a second hit, stress to podocytes, or a gain of function is still debated. APOL1-G0 appears to be dispensable for kidney development and homeostasis, and a physiologic function—except for its trypanolytic activity—has not been evident (67,68). APOL1-G0 in cell culture models has been shown to provide innate immunity against viral infections like HIV (22), a function that is lost by the kidney disease–associated variants in a murine model of HIV-associated nephropathy (69). Hence, it is possible that the APOL1-G0–related, protective cellular processes are “activated” in response to an external second stress, which explains why not all individuals with two copies of APOL1-G1 and/or -G2 variants develop kidney disease. However, APOL1-G1 and -G2 appear to change the cellular localization and oligomerization pattern (36) with associated cytotoxicity, which was not rescued by APOL1-G0 (70) in in vitro studies, suggesting a dominant gain of function could also mediate CKD pathogenesis.

Recent evidence showed the critical importance of the naturally occurring haplotype background of all APOL1 genotypes when conducting these studies, and also suggested that genetic polymorphisms located far from the G1 and G2 sites influence the function of the protein (71). Either of these may affect the mechanism of APOL1 folding, if not the fold itself. This underscores the importance of understanding the full-length structure of APOL1 in addition to the individual domain structure.

Future Directions

Further studies will be needed to characterize the cellular function of APOL1-G0 and the disrupted homeostatic pathways triggered by the G1 and G2 variants, which result in kidney disease. One of the major goals will be to translate this information into the development of therapeutic strategies that will modify the course of APOL1-associated CKD. Understanding the three-dimensional protein structure of APOL1 will provide key insights that will help us in solving this puzzle. However, the cellular properties of APOL1 pose several challenges in conducting these structural studies. The oligomerization of APOL1 into high mol wt forms is a major hindrance for using NMR-based structural studies to resolve the full-length protein structure because its large size increases the spectral overlap and line-width measurements resulting from the large number of signals and slow tumbling of protein, respectively. However, NMR spectroscopy remains a valuable tool for studying the structural properties of individual protein domains and to probe the time-dependent behavior (internal protein-dynamics behavior) of the reference and of the variant APOL1s. The membrane-interacting properties, post-translational modifications, and cytotoxicity pose limitations for the expression and purification of the natively folded APOL1 protein, which are necessary for structural studies, including x-ray crystallography and cryo-EM. Although these challenges exist, efforts to define the structure of APOL1 proteins using multiple methodologies will advance our understanding of APOL1 variant–mediated kidney disease and aid in the development of druggable targets.

Disclosures

All authors have nothing to disclose.

Funding

None.

Author Contributions

M. Buck provided supervision; M. Buck and S.M. Madhavan reviewed and edited the manuscript; and S.M. Madhavan conceptualized the study and wrote the original draft.

  • Received April 27, 2020.
  • Accepted November 4, 2020.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Genovese G,
    2. Friedman DJ,
    3. Ross MD,
    4. Lecordier L,
    5. Uzureau P,
    6. Freedman BI,
    7. Bowden DW,
    8. Langefeld CD,
    9. Oleksyk TK,
    10. Uscinski Knob AL,
    11. Bernhardy AJ,
    12. Hicks PJ,
    13. Nelson GW,
    14. Vanhollebeke B,
    15. Winkler CA,
    16. Kopp JB,
    17. Pays E,
    18. Pollak MR
    : Association of trypanolytic ApoL1 variants with kidney disease in African Americans. Science 329: 841–845, 2010 10.1126/science.1193032
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Tzur S,
    2. Rosset S,
    3. Shemer R,
    4. Yudkovsky G,
    5. Selig S,
    6. Tarekegn A,
    7. Bekele E,
    8. Bradman N,
    9. Wasser WG,
    10. Behar DM,
    11. Skorecki K
    : Missense mutations in the APOL1 gene are highly associated with end stage kidney disease risk previously attributed to the MYH9 gene. Hum Genet 128: 345–350, 2010 10.1007/s00439-010-0861-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Kopp JB,
    2. Nelson GW,
    3. Sampath K,
    4. Johnson RC,
    5. Genovese G,
    6. An P,
    7. Friedman D,
    8. Briggs W,
    9. Dart R,
    10. Korbet S,
    11. Mokrzycki MH,
    12. Kimmel PL,
    13. Limou S,
    14. Ahuja TS,
    15. Berns JS,
    16. Fryc J,
    17. Simon EE,
    18. Smith MC,
    19. Trachtman H,
    20. Michel DM,
    21. Schelling JR,
    22. Vlahov D,
    23. Pollak M,
    24. Winkler CA
    : APOL1 genetic variants in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and HIV-associated nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 22: 2129–2137, 2011 10.1681/ASN.2011040388
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Parsa A,
    2. Kao WH,
    3. Xie D,
    4. Astor BC,
    5. Li M,
    6. Hsu CY,
    7. Feldman HI,
    8. Parekh RS,
    9. Kusek JW,
    10. Greene TH,
    11. Fink JC,
    12. Anderson AH,
    13. Choi MJ,
    14. Wright JT Jr.,
    15. Lash JP,
    16. Freedman BI,
    17. Ojo A,
    18. Winkler CA,
    19. Raj DS,
    20. Kopp JB,
    21. He J,
    22. Jensvold NG,
    23. Tao K,
    24. Lipkowitz MS,
    25. Appel LJ
    ; AASK Study InvestigatorsCRIC Study Investigators: APOL1 risk variants, race, and progression of chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 369: 2183–2196, 2013 10.1056/NEJMoa1310345
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Genovese G,
    2. Tonna SJ,
    3. Knob AU,
    4. Appel GB,
    5. Katz A,
    6. Bernhardy AJ,
    7. Needham AW,
    8. Lazarus R,
    9. Pollak MR
    : A risk allele for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in African Americans is located within a region containing APOL1 and MYH9. Kidney Int 78: 698–704, 2010 10.1038/ki.2010.251
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Page NM,
    2. Butlin DJ,
    3. Lomthaisong K,
    4. Lowry PJ
    : The human apolipoprotein L gene cluster: Identification, classification, and sites of distribution. Genomics 74: 71–78, 2001 10.1006/geno.2001.6534
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Smith EE,
    2. Malik HS
    : The apolipoprotein L family of programmed cell death and immunity genes rapidly evolved in primates at discrete sites of host-pathogen interactions. Genome Res 19: 850–858, 2009 10.1101/gr.085647.108
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Monajemi H,
    2. Fontijn RD,
    3. Pannekoek H,
    4. Horrevoets AJ
    : The apolipoprotein L gene cluster has emerged recently in evolution and is expressed in human vascular tissue. Genomics 79: 539–546, 2002 10.1006/geno.2002.6729
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Duchateau PN,
    2. Pullinger CR,
    3. Orellana RE,
    4. Kunitake ST,
    5. Naya-Vigne J,
    6. O’Connor PM,
    7. Malloy MJ,
    8. Kane JP
    : Apolipoprotein L, a new human high density lipoprotein apolipoprotein expressed by the pancreas. Identification, cloning, characterization, and plasma distribution of apolipoprotein L. J Biol Chem 272: 25576–25582, 1997 10.1074/jbc.272.41.25576
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Shukha K,
    2. Mueller JL,
    3. Chung RT,
    4. Curry MP,
    5. Friedman DJ,
    6. Pollak MR,
    7. Berg AH
    : Most ApoL1 is secreted by the liver. J Am Soc Nephrol 28: 1079–1083, 2017 10.1681/ASN.2016040441
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Pérez-Morga D,
    2. Vanhollebeke B,
    3. Paturiaux-Hanocq F,
    4. Nolan DP,
    5. Lins L,
    6. Homblé F,
    7. Vanhamme L,
    8. Tebabi P,
    9. Pays A,
    10. Poelvoorde P,
    11. Jacquet A,
    12. Brasseur R,
    13. Pays E
    : Apolipoprotein L-I promotes trypanosome lysis by forming pores in lysosomal membranes. Science 309: 469–472, 2005 10.1126/science.1114566
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Vanhamme L,
    2. Paturiaux-Hanocq F,
    3. Poelvoorde P,
    4. Nolan DP,
    5. Lins L,
    6. Van Den Abbeele J,
    7. Pays A,
    8. Tebabi P,
    9. Van Xong H,
    10. Jacquet A,
    11. Moguilevsky N,
    12. Dieu M,
    13. Kane JP,
    14. De Baetselier P,
    15. Brasseur R,
    16. Pays E
    : Apolipoprotein L-I is the trypanosome lytic factor of human serum. Nature 422: 83–87, 2003 10.1038/nature01461
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Lecordier L,
    2. Vanhollebeke B,
    3. Poelvoorde P,
    4. Tebabi P,
    5. Paturiaux-Hanocq F,
    6. Andris F,
    7. Lins L,
    8. Pays E
    : C-terminal mutants of apolipoprotein L-I efficiently kill both Trypanosoma brucei brucei and Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000685, 2009 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000685
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Madhavan SM,
    2. O’Toole JF,
    3. Konieczkowski M,
    4. Barisoni L,
    5. Thomas DB,
    6. Ganesan S,
    7. Bruggeman LA,
    8. Buck M,
    9. Sedor JR
    : APOL1 variants change C-terminal conformational dynamics and binding to SNARE protein VAMP8. JCI Insight 2: e92581, 2017 10.1172/jci.insight.92581
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Madhavan SM,
    2. O’Toole JF,
    3. Konieczkowski M,
    4. Ganesan S,
    5. Bruggeman LA,
    6. Sedor JR
    : APOL1 localization in normal kidney and nondiabetic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 22: 2119–2128, 2011 10.1681/ASN.2011010069
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Ma L,
    2. Shelness GS,
    3. Snipes JA,
    4. Murea M,
    5. Antinozzi PA,
    6. Cheng D,
    7. Saleem MA,
    8. Satchell SC,
    9. Banas B,
    10. Mathieson PW,
    11. Kretzler M,
    12. Hemal AK,
    13. Rudel LL,
    14. Petrovic S,
    15. Weckerle A,
    16. Pollak MR,
    17. Ross MD,
    18. Parks JS,
    19. Freedman BI
    : Localization of APOL1 protein and mRNA in the human kidney: Nondiseased tissue, primary cells, and immortalized cell lines. J Am Soc Nephrol 26: 339–348, 2015 10.1681/ASN.2013091017
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Kotb AM,
    2. Simon O,
    3. Blumenthal A,
    4. Vogelgesang S,
    5. Dombrowski F,
    6. Amann K,
    7. Zimmermann U,
    8. Endlich K,
    9. Endlich N
    : Knockdown of ApoL1 in zebrafish larvae affects the glomerular filtration barrier and the expression of nephrin. PLoS One 11: e0153768, 2016 10.1371/journal.pone.0153768
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Nichols B,
    2. Jog P,
    3. Lee JH,
    4. Blackler D,
    5. Wilmot M,
    6. D’Agati V,
    7. Markowitz G,
    8. Kopp JB,
    9. Alper SL,
    10. Pollak MR,
    11. Friedman DJ
    : Innate immunity pathways regulate the nephropathy gene Apolipoprotein L1. Kidney Int 87: 332–342, 2015 10.1038/ki.2014.270
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Wan G,
    2. Zhaorigetu S,
    3. Liu Z,
    4. Kaini R,
    5. Jiang Z,
    6. Hu CA
    : Apolipoprotein L1, a novel Bcl-2 homology domain 3-only lipid-binding protein, induces autophagic cell death. J Biol Chem 283: 21540–21549, 2008
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Beckerman P,
    2. Bi-Karchin J,
    3. Park AS,
    4. Qiu C,
    5. Dummer PD,
    6. Soomro I,
    7. Boustany-Kari CM,
    8. Pullen SS,
    9. Miner JH,
    10. Hu CA,
    11. Rohacs T,
    12. Inoue K,
    13. Ishibe S,
    14. Saleem MA,
    15. Palmer MB,
    16. Cuervo AM,
    17. Kopp JB,
    18. Susztak K
    : Transgenic expression of human APOL1 risk variants in podocytes induces kidney disease in mice. Nat Med 23: 429–438, 2017 10.1038/nm.4287
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Bruno J,
    2. Pozzi N,
    3. Oliva J,
    4. Edwards JC
    : Apolipoprotein L1 confers pH-switchable ion permeability to phospholipid vesicles. J Biol Chem 292: 18344–18353, 2017 10.1074/jbc.M117.813444
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Taylor HE,
    2. Khatua AK,
    3. Popik W
    : The innate immune factor apolipoprotein L1 restricts HIV-1 infection. J Virol 88: 592–603, 2014 10.1128/JVI.02828-13
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Mikulak J,
    2. Oriolo F,
    3. Portale F,
    4. Tentorio P,
    5. Lan X,
    6. Saleem MA,
    7. Skorecki K,
    8. Singhal PC,
    9. Mavilio D
    : Impact of APOL1 polymorphism and IL-1β priming in the entry and persistence of HIV-1 in human podocytes. Retrovirology 13: 63, 2016 10.1186/s12977-016-0296-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Thomson R,
    2. Genovese G,
    3. Canon C,
    4. Kovacsics D,
    5. Higgins MK,
    6. Carrington M,
    7. Winkler CA,
    8. Kopp J,
    9. Rotimi C,
    10. Adeyemo A,
    11. Doumatey A,
    12. Ayodo G,
    13. Alper SL,
    14. Pollak MR,
    15. Friedman DJ,
    16. Raper J
    : Evolution of the primate trypanolytic factor APOL1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111: E2130–E2139, 2014 10.1073/pnas.1400699111
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Modiano D,
    2. Luoni G,
    3. Sirima BS,
    4. Simporé J,
    5. Verra F,
    6. Konaté A,
    7. Rastrelli E,
    8. Olivieri A,
    9. Calissano C,
    10. Paganotti GM,
    11. D’Urbano L,
    12. Sanou I,
    13. Sawadogo A,
    14. Modiano G,
    15. Coluzzi M
    : Haemoglobin C protects against clinical Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature 414: 305–308, 2001 10.1038/35104556
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Williams TN,
    2. Mwangi TW,
    3. Wambua S,
    4. Peto TE,
    5. Weatherall DJ,
    6. Gupta S,
    7. Recker M,
    8. Penman BS,
    9. Uyoga S,
    10. Macharia A,
    11. Mwacharo JK,
    12. Snow RW,
    13. Marsh K
    : Negative epistasis between the malaria-protective effects of alpha+-thalassemia and the sickle cell trait. Nat Genet 37: 1253–1257, 2005 10.1038/ng1660
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Bruggeman LA,
    2. O’Toole JF,
    3. Ross MD,
    4. Madhavan SM,
    5. Smurzynski M,
    6. Wu K,
    7. Bosch RJ,
    8. Gupta S,
    9. Pollak MR,
    10. Sedor JR,
    11. Kalayjian RC
    : Plasma apolipoprotein L1 levels do not correlate with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 25: 634–644, 2014 10.1681/ASN.2013070700
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Kozlitina J,
    2. Zhou H,
    3. Brown PN,
    4. Rohm RJ,
    5. Pan Y,
    6. Ayanoglu G,
    7. Du X,
    8. Rimmer E,
    9. Reilly DF,
    10. Roddy TP,
    11. Cully DF,
    12. Vogt TF,
    13. Blom D,
    14. Hoek M
    : Plasma levels of risk-variant APOL1 do not associate with renal disease in a population-based cohort. J Am Soc Nephrol 27: 3204–3219, 2016 10.1681/ASN.2015101121
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Larsen CP,
    2. Beggs ML,
    3. Saeed M,
    4. Walker PD
    : Apolipoprotein L1 risk variants associate with systemic lupus erythematosus-associated collapsing glomerulopathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 24: 722–725, 2013 10.1681/ASN.2012121180
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Ashley-Koch AE,
    2. Okocha EC,
    3. Garrett ME,
    4. Soldano K,
    5. De Castro LM,
    6. Jonassaint JC,
    7. Orringer EP,
    8. Eckman JR,
    9. Telen MJ
    : MYH9 and APOL1 are both associated with sickle cell disease nephropathy. Br J Haematol 155: 386–394, 2011 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08832.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Kruzel-Davila E,
    2. Shemer R,
    3. Ofir A,
    4. Bavli-Kertselli I,
    5. Darlyuk-Saadon I,
    6. Oren-Giladi P,
    7. Wasser WG,
    8. Magen D,
    9. Zaknoun E,
    10. Schuldiner M,
    11. Salzberg A,
    12. Kornitzer D,
    13. Marelja Z,
    14. Simons M,
    15. Skorecki K
    : APOL1-mediated cell injury involves disruption of conserved trafficking processes. J Am Soc Nephrol 28: 1117–1130, 2017 10.1681/ASN.2016050546
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Lan X,
    2. Jhaveri A,
    3. Cheng K,
    4. Wen H,
    5. Saleem MA,
    6. Mathieson PW,
    7. Mikulak J,
    8. Aviram S,
    9. Malhotra A,
    10. Skorecki K,
    11. Singhal PC
    : APOL1 risk variants enhance podocyte necrosis through compromising lysosomal membrane permeability. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 307: F326–F336, 2014 10.1152/ajprenal.00647.2013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Olabisi OA,
    2. Zhang JY,
    3. VerPlank L,
    4. Zahler N,
    5. DiBartolo S 3rd.,
    6. Heneghan JF,
    7. Schlöndorff JS,
    8. Suh JH,
    9. Yan P,
    10. Alper SL,
    11. Friedman DJ,
    12. Pollak MR
    : APOL1 kidney disease risk variants cause cytotoxicity by depleting cellular potassium and inducing stress-activated protein kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113: 830–837, 2016 10.1073/pnas.1522913113
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Wen H,
    2. Kumar V,
    3. Lan X,
    4. Shoshtari SSM,
    5. Eng JM,
    6. Zhou X,
    7. Wang F,
    8. Wang H,
    9. Skorecki K,
    10. Xing G,
    11. Wu G,
    12. Luo H,
    13. Malhotra A,
    14. Singhal PC
    : APOL1 risk variants cause podocytes injury through enhancing endoplasmic reticulum stress. Biosci Rep 38: BSR20171713, 2018 10.1042/BSR20171713
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Granado D,
    2. Müller D,
    3. Krausel V,
    4. Kruzel-Davila E,
    5. Schuberth C,
    6. Eschborn M,
    7. Wedlich-Söldner R,
    8. Skorecki K,
    9. Pavenstädt H,
    10. Michgehl U,
    11. Weide T
    : Intracellular APOL1 risk variants cause cytotoxicity accompanied by energy depletion. J Am Soc Nephrol 28: 3227–3238, 2017 10.1681/ASN.2016111220
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Shah SS,
    2. Lannon H,
    3. Dias L,
    4. Zhang JY,
    5. Alper SL,
    6. Pollak MR,
    7. Friedman DJ
    : APOL1 kidney risk variants induce cell death via mitochondrial translocation and opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore. J Am Soc Nephrol 30: 2355–2368, 2019 10.1681/ASN.2019020114
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Shaanan B
    : Structure of human oxyhaemoglobin at 2.1 A resolution. J Mol Biol 171: 31–59, 1983 10.1016/S0022-2836(83)80313-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Fermi G,
    2. Perutz MF,
    3. Shaanan B,
    4. Fourme R
    : The crystal structure of human deoxyhaemoglobin at 1.74 A resolution. J Mol Biol 175: 159–174, 1984 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90472-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Harrington DJ,
    2. Adachi K,
    3. Royer WE Jr.
    : The high resolution crystal structure of deoxyhemoglobin S. J Mol Biol 272: 398–407, 1997 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1253
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Nakagawa A,
    2. Lui FE,
    3. Wassaf D,
    4. Yefidoff-Freedman R,
    5. Casalena D,
    6. Palmer MA,
    7. Meadows J,
    8. Mozzarelli A,
    9. Ronda L,
    10. Abdulmalik O,
    11. Bloch KD,
    12. Safo MK,
    13. Zapol WM
    : Identification of a small molecule that increases hemoglobin oxygen affinity and reduces SS erythrocyte sickling. ACS Chem Biol 9: 2318–2325, 2014 10.1021/cb500230b
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Oksenberg D,
    2. Dufu K,
    3. Patel MP,
    4. Chuang C,
    5. Li Z,
    6. Xu Q,
    7. Silva-Garcia A,
    8. Zhou C,
    9. Hutchaleelaha A,
    10. Patskovska L,
    11. Patskovsky Y,
    12. Almo SC,
    13. Sinha U,
    14. Metcalf BW,
    15. Archer DR
    : GBT440 increases haemoglobin oxygen affinity, reduces sickling and prolongs RBC half-life in a murine model of sickle cell disease. Br J Haematol 175: 141–153, 2016 10.1111/bjh.14214
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Vichinsky E,
    2. Hoppe CC,
    3. Ataga KI,
    4. Ware RE,
    5. Nduba V,
    6. El-Beshlawy A,
    7. Hassab H,
    8. Achebe MM,
    9. Alkindi S,
    10. Brown RC,
    11. Diuguid DL,
    12. Telfer P,
    13. Tsitsikas DA,
    14. Elghandour A,
    15. Gordeuk VR,
    16. Kanter J,
    17. Abboud MR,
    18. Lehrer-Graiwer J,
    19. Tonda M,
    20. Intondi A,
    21. Tong B,
    22. Howard J
    ; HOPE Trial Investigators: A phase 3 randomized trial of voxelotor in sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med 381: 509–519, 2019 10.1056/NEJMoa1903212
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Murata K,
    2. Mitsuoka K,
    3. Hirai T,
    4. Walz T,
    5. Agre P,
    6. Heymann JB,
    7. Engel A,
    8. Fujiyoshi Y
    : Structural determinants of water permeation through aquaporin-1. Nature 407: 599–605, 2000 10.1038/35036519
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Sánchez R,
    2. Sali A
    : Advances in comparative protein-structure modelling. Curr Opin Struct Biol 7: 206–214, 1997 10.1016/S0959-440X(97)80027-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Martí-Renom MA,
    2. Stuart AC,
    3. Fiser A,
    4. Sánchez R,
    5. Melo F,
    6. Sali A
    : Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 29: 291–325, 2000 10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.291
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Bowie JU,
    2. Lüthy R,
    3. Eisenberg D
    : A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 253: 164–170, 1991 10.1126/science.1853201
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Wu S,
    2. Skolnick J,
    3. Zhang Y
    : Ab initio modeling of small proteins by iterative TASSER simulations. BMC Biol 5: 17, 2007 10.1186/1741-7007-5-17
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Liwo A,
    2. Lee J,
    3. Ripoll DR,
    4. Pillardy J,
    5. Scheraga HA
    : Protein structure prediction by global optimization of a potential energy function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 5482–5485, 1999 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5482
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Karplus M,
    2. McCammon JA
    : Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat Struct Biol 9: 646–652, 2002 10.1038/nsb0902-646
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Li Z,
    2. Cao S,
    3. Buck M
    : K-ras at anionic membranes: Orientation, Orientation…Orientation. Recent simulations and experiments. Biophys J 110: 1033–1035, 2016 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.01.020
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Zhang L,
    2. Buck M
    : Molecular simulations of a dynamic protein complex: Role of salt-bridges and polar interactions in configurational transitions. Biophys J 105: 2412–2417, 2013 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.09.052
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Pays E,
    2. Vanhollebeke B,
    3. Uzureau P,
    4. Lecordier L,
    5. Pérez-Morga D
    : The molecular arms race between African trypanosomes and humans. Nat Rev Microbiol 12: 575–584, 2014 10.1038/nrmicro3298
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Pays E,
    2. Vanhollebeke B,
    3. Vanhamme L,
    4. Paturiaux-Hanocq F,
    5. Nolan DP,
    6. Pérez-Morga D
    : The trypanolytic factor of human serum. Nat Rev Microbiol 4: 477–486, 2006 10.1038/nrmicro1428
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Sharma AK,
    2. Friedman DJ,
    3. Pollak MR,
    4. Alper SL
    : Structural characterization of the C-terminal coiled-coil domains of wild-type and kidney disease-associated mutants of apolipoprotein L1. FEBS J 283: 1846–1862, 2016 10.1111/febs.13706
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Jha A,
    2. Kumar V,
    3. Haque S,
    4. Ayasolla K,
    5. Saha S,
    6. Lan X,
    7. Malhotra A,
    8. Saleem MA,
    9. Skorecki K,
    10. Singhal PC
    : Alterations in plasma membrane ion channel structures stimulate NLRP3 inflammasome activation in APOL1 risk milieu. FEBS J 287: 2000–2022, 2020 10.1111/febs.15133
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. Vanwalleghem G,
    2. Fontaine F,
    3. Lecordier L,
    4. Tebabi P,
    5. Klewe K,
    6. Nolan DP,
    7. Yamaryo-Botté Y,
    8. Botté C,
    9. Kremer A,
    10. Burkard GS,
    11. Rassow J,
    12. Roditi I,
    13. Pérez-Morga D,
    14. Pays E
    : Coupling of lysosomal and mitochondrial membrane permeabilization in trypanolysis by APOL1. Nat Commun 6: 8078, 2015 10.1038/ncomms9078
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Schaub C,
    2. Verdi J,
    3. Lee P,
    4. Terra N,
    5. Limon G,
    6. Raper J,
    7. Thomson R
    : Cation channel conductance and pH gating of the innate immunity factor APOL1 are governed by pore-lining residues within the C-terminal domain. J Biol Chem 295: 13138–13149, 2020 10.1074/jbc.RA120.014201
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Giovinazzo JA,
    2. Thomson RP,
    3. Khalizova N,
    4. Zager PJ,
    5. Malani N,
    6. Rodriguez-Boulan E,
    7. Raper J,
    8. Schreiner R
    : Apolipoprotein L-1 renal risk variants form active channels at the plasma membrane driving cytotoxicity. eLife 9: e51185, 2020 10.7554/eLife.51185
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Ma L,
    2. Ainsworth HC,
    3. Snipes JA,
    4. Murea M,
    5. Choi YA,
    6. Langefeld CD,
    7. Parks JS,
    8. Bharadwaj MS,
    9. Chou JW,
    10. Hemal AK,
    11. Petrovic S,
    12. Craddock AL,
    13. Cheng D,
    14. Hawkins GA,
    15. Miller LD,
    16. Hicks PJ,
    17. Saleem MA,
    18. Divers J,
    19. Molina AJA,
    20. Freedman BI
    : APOL1 kidney-risk variants induce mitochondrial fission. Kidney Int Rep 5: 891–904, 2020 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.03.020
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. Ma L,
    2. Chou JW,
    3. Snipes JA,
    4. Bharadwaj MS,
    5. Craddock AL,
    6. Cheng D,
    7. Weckerle A,
    8. Petrovic S,
    9. Hicks PJ,
    10. Hemal AK,
    11. Hawkins GA,
    12. Miller LD,
    13. Molina AJ,
    14. Langefeld CD,
    15. Murea M,
    16. Parks JS,
    17. Freedman BI
    : APOL1 renal-risk variants induce mitochondrial dysfunction. J Am Soc Nephrol 28: 1093–1105, 2017 10.1681/ASN.2016050567
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. ↵
    1. O’Toole JF,
    2. Schilling W,
    3. Kunze D,
    4. Madhavan SM,
    5. Konieczkowski M,
    6. Gu Y,
    7. Luo L,
    8. Wu Z,
    9. Bruggeman LA,
    10. Sedor JR
    : ApoL1 overexpression drives variant-independent cytotoxicity. J Am Soc Nephrol 29: 869–879, 2018 10.1681/ASN.2016121322
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    1. Okamoto K,
    2. Rausch JW,
    3. Wakashin H,
    4. Fu Y,
    5. Chung JY,
    6. Dummer PD,
    7. Shin MK,
    8. Chandra P,
    9. Suzuki K,
    10. Shrivastav S,
    11. Rosenberg AZ,
    12. Hewitt SM,
    13. Ray PE,
    14. Noiri E,
    15. Le Grice SFJ,
    16. Hoek M,
    17. Han Z,
    18. Winkler CA,
    19. Kopp JB
    : APOL1 risk allele RNA contributes to renal toxicity by activating protein kinase R. Commun Biol 1: 188, 2018 10.1038/s42003-018-0188-2
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Bogdanov M,
    2. Xie J,
    3. Heacock P,
    4. Dowhan W
    : To flip or not to flip: Lipid-protein charge interactions are a determinant of final membrane protein topology. J Cell Biol 182: 925–935, 2008 10.1083/jcb.200803097
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    1. Lu Y,
    2. Turnbull IR,
    3. Bragin A,
    4. Carveth K,
    5. Verkman AS,
    6. Skach WR
    : Reorientation of aquaporin-1 topology during maturation in the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Biol Cell 11: 2973–2985, 2000 10.1091/mbc.11.9.2973
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Hong W
    : SNAREs and traffic. Biochim Biophys Acta 1744: 120–144, 2005 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.03.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Jahn R,
    2. Scheller RH
    : SNAREs – engines for membrane fusion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7: 631–643, 2006 10.1038/nrm2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Vanhollebeke B,
    2. Truc P,
    3. Poelvoorde P,
    4. Pays A,
    5. Joshi PP,
    6. Katti R,
    7. Jannin JG,
    8. Pays E
    : Human Trypanosoma evansi infection linked to a lack of apolipoprotein L-I. N Engl J Med 355: 2752–2756, 2006 10.1056/NEJMoa063265
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Johnstone DB,
    2. Shegokar V,
    3. Nihalani D,
    4. Rathore YS,
    5. Mallik L,
    6. Ashish,
    7. Zare V,
    8. Ikizler HO,
    9. Powar R,
    10. Holzman LB
    : APOL1 null alleles from a rural village in India do not correlate with glomerulosclerosis. PLoS One 7: e51546, 2012 10.1371/journal.pone.0051546
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Bruggeman LA,
    2. Wu Z,
    3. Luo L,
    4. Madhavan S,
    5. Drawz PE,
    6. Thomas DB,
    7. Barisoni L,
    8. O’Toole JF,
    9. Sedor JR
    : APOL1-G0 protects podocytes in a mouse model of HIV-associated nephropathy. PLoS One 14: e0224408, 2019 10.1371/journal.pone.0224408
    OpenUrl
  70. ↵
    1. Datta S,
    2. Kataria R,
    3. Zhang JY,
    4. Moore S,
    5. Petitpas K,
    6. Mohamed A,
    7. Zahler N,
    8. Pollak MR,
    9. Olabisi OA
    : Kidney disease-associated APOL1 variants have dose-dependent, dominant toxic gain-of-function. J Am Soc Nephrol 31: 2083–2096, 2020 10.1681/ASN.2020010079
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. ↵
    1. Lannon H,
    2. Shah SS,
    3. Dias L,
    4. Blackler D,
    5. Alper SL,
    6. Pollak MR,
    7. Friedman DJ
    : Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) risk variant toxicity depends on the haplotype background. Kidney Int 96: 1303–1307, 2019 10.1016/j.kint.2019.07.010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top

In this issue

View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Citation Tools
Request Permissions
The Relationship between APOL1 Structure and Function: Clinical Implications
Sethu M. Madhavan, Matthias Buck
Kidney360 Jan 2021, 2 (1) 134-140; DOI: 10.34067/KID.0002482020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Keywords