Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Early Access
    • Current Issue
    • Kidney360 Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
  • Clinical Images
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • More
    • About Kidney360
    • Advertising
    • Disqus Commenting
    • Reprint Information
    • Feedback
    • Email Alerts
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • JASN
    • CJASN
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • JASN
    • CJASN
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Early Access
    • Current Issue
    • Kidney360 Podcasts
    • Subject Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
  • Clinical Images
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • More
    • About Kidney360
    • Advertising
    • Disqus Commenting
    • Reprint Information
    • Feedback
    • Email Alerts
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow Kidney360 on Twitter
  • Community Forum
  • Kidney360 RSS
Editorials

Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA: Is It All the Same? The Jury Is Still Out

Neetika Garg
Kidney360 October 2020, 1 (10) 1038-1039; DOI: https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0004412020
Neetika Garg
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Neetika Garg
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading
  • transplantation
  • allosure
  • biomarker
  • donor-derived cell-free DNA
  • kidney transplant
  • prospera
  • rejection

Monitoring kidney transplant recipients for evidence of rejection is essential to mitigate the risk of graft failure. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a dynamic marker of cell turnover in the allograft that can be used as a surrogate marker of allograft injury and allows for noninvasive monitoring (1⇓–3). Quantification of the dd-cfDNA fraction requires differentiation of donor and recipient genomes. Early methodologies relied on detection of genes found on the Y chromosome, which limited use to women recipients with men organ donors, or genome sequencing, which required separate genotyping of the donor (4). Targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) techniques use panels of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to differentiate dd-cfDNA from recipient cell-free DNA. Currently available NGS platforms for dd-cfDNA fraction quantification include AlloSure (CareDx, Inc., Brisbane, CA) and Prospera (Natera, Inc., San Carlos, CA). Although both rely on panels of SNPs, their methodologies are distinct. AlloSure previously used a panel of 266 SNPs selected from across all 22 somatic chromosomes with sufficient separation and low linkage (5), and it has since been updated to include 405 SNPs as noted in the recent publication by Melancon et al. (6). Prospera uses 13,392 SNPs concentrated across four chromosomes (3). The latter was adapted for use in kidney transplantation from an approach developed for noninvasive prenatal monitoring. Both of these tests allow for the measurement of dd-cfDNA in kidney transplant recipients without requiring knowledge of donor genotypes.

In his recent publication, Melancon et al. (6) reported results from simultaneous AlloSure and Prospera tests performed in 76 patients …

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Kidney360: 1 (10)
Kidney360
Vol. 1, Issue 10
29 Oct 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Society of Nephrology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA: Is It All the Same? The Jury Is Still Out
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA: Is It All the Same? The Jury Is Still Out
Neetika Garg
Kidney360 Oct 2020, 1 (10) 1038-1039; DOI: 10.34067/KID.0004412020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA: Is It All the Same? The Jury Is Still Out
Neetika Garg
Kidney360 Oct 2020, 1 (10) 1038-1039; DOI: 10.34067/KID.0004412020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Disclosures
    • Funding
    • Acknowledgments
    • Author Contributions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Self-Referral Patterns of Living Kidney Donors via Social Media: Examining an Expanding Platform
  • Dialysis Filter Life in COVID-19: Early Lessons from the Pandemic
Show more Editorials

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • Donor-Derived Cell Free DNA: Is It All the Same?
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • transplantation
  • allosure
  • biomarker
  • donor-derived cell-free DNA
  • Kidney Transplant
  • prospera
  • rejection

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Resources
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • Kidney360
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About Kidney360
  • Kidney360 Email Alerts
  • Kidney360 Podcasts
  • Kidney360 RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Disqus Code of Conduct
  • Disqus Information
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JASN and CJASN

© 2021 American Society of Nephrology

Online ISSN - 2641-7650

Powered by HighWire